What We Talk About When We Talk About Rob Bell, pt 4

In Conclusion: So what do I think? I hope the preceding survey, brief as it is, demonstrates that Rob Bell's approach to the Bible and to biblical authority is not a simple yes/no, does-he-or-doesn't-he question. The fact of the matter is: everything Bell does, theologically and hermeneutically, can be found elsewhere in the broad Judeo-Christian … Continue reading What We Talk About When We Talk About Rob Bell, pt 4

What We Talk About When We Talk About Rob Bell, pt 2

Pt 2: But is he biblical? That's the question.  The answer in short: it depends on how you define "biblical". If "biblical" = Evangelical hermeneutics, the author's historically-determined intention for a passage governing the modern meaning and application, then no, he is not biblical. Of course, much of popular, Evangelical, "Bible-believing" Christianity is a heckuva lot more … Continue reading What We Talk About When We Talk About Rob Bell, pt 2

Ebert on Herzog

I've often thought that preachers should read the Bible the way Roger Ebert watched (and preach the way Ebert wrote about) films. I've also often thought Werner Herzog was among the greatest artists of our time.  Watch Grizzly Man.  Watch Into the Abyss.  Tell me I'm wrong; this is film as poetry, film that shakes … Continue reading Ebert on Herzog