A question for “Ask Science Mike“:
I have a question about monogamy and sexuality.
There appear to be many reasons that monogamy is preferable to promiscuity. Families are more likely to be stable, which makes society more likely to be stable. Sexually transmitted diseases. Strengthening commitment between partners. Plus there’s that whole, “thou shalt not commit adultery” thing, which–even with the differences between ancient Israel and the modern West–still holds a great deal of authority and brings numerous benefits.
But monogamy does not appear to be natural. I’m an evangelical Christian, married, heterosexual, fifty-something-white-guy. From experience and observation, it’s clear that most heterosexual males are naturally interested in more than one partner–biological imperative, whatever.
But for a variety of reasons, I and many people like me don’t seek out or cultivate opportunities to be with other partners. Christianity teaches me that my desire for other partners is from the ego / flesh, is sinful, etc. In addition to wanting stable families and stable societies, and to avoid sexually transmitted diseases, etc., I don’t want to betray God that way.
So: the best thing for me and men like me to do is to fight that part of our sexual nature, deny and discipline it.
How then is the opposite argument–“it’s their nature, you can’t fight against or judge acts (to say nothing of judging people) that are according to nature”–used to legitimize same sex attraction? I sense that in some ways, I’m comparing apples and oranges. Help me suss this out.
P in Dallas